Matrix properties
number of rows	308
number of columns	308
nonzeros	3,182
structural full rank?	yes
structural rank	308
# of blocks from dmperm	2
# strongly connected comp.	2
explicit zero entries	0
nonzero pattern symmetry	43%
numeric value symmetry	22%
type	real
structure	unsymmetric
Cholesky candidate?	no
positive definite?	no

author	Y. Chen, A. Wathen, S. Zhu
editor	T. Davis
date	2012
kind	2D/3D problem
2D/3D problem?	yes

Notes:

Closest Point Method, Yujia Chen, Andy Wathen, Shengxin Zhu        
                                                                   
A method for computing on surfaces.  For more information see:     
http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/~macdonald/closestpoint/              
                                                                   
One of the matrices in this collection (cz10228) is solved poorly  
by x=A\b in MATLAB R2012a.  The solution is to use this setting:   
                                                                   
    spparms ('piv_tol', 0.5)                                       
    x = A\b                                                        
                                                                   
which changes the pivot tolerance.  MATLAB has a test which        
checks the accuracy of x=A\b when using UMFPACK, and if the        
accuracy is poor, it refactorizes the matrix with a piv_tol        
of 1.0 (standard partial pivoting).  For the cz10228 matrix,       
the test is nearly, but not quite, triggered.  The other matrices  
do not cause this problem.                                         
                                                                   
Further details from Shengxin Zhu:                                 
                                                                   
Generally speaking, the matrix comes from the numerical solution of
Poisson equation on a unit circle by solving an embedding PDE posed
in a narrow band around the circle. Of course the easiest way to   
solve PDE on a unit circle is to parametrize it and then solve a 1D
problem; but here we just want to test the effectiveness of the    
embedding method for solving PDEs on general curves or surfaces.   
The method extends the original surface PDE to a band around the   
surface, and then solve the extended PDE on a Cartesian grid by a  
finite difference scheme. In order to define such a PDE, one has to
both define proper embedding differential operator and extend the  
solution from the surface to the embedding space. One natural way  
is to enforce the solution being constant along the normal         
direction of the surface so that the surface differential operator 
could be replaced by standard Cartesian differential operator. Here
in the case of Poisson equation on a unit circle, we solve a       
standard Poisson equation on a 2D cartesian grid around the circle 
with suitable right hand side and Neumann boundary condition on the
boundary of the band. We enforce the Neumann boundary condition by 
taking the value of each boundary point to be the value of its     
closest point on the circle; and since the closest point is usually
not a grid point, its value is obtained by interpolation of values 
of the surrounding points. Putting the process into a sparse       
matrix, and change one row of the matrix to fix the value of one   
point of the solution and ensure the matrix is nonsingular.        
                                                                   
I tried different bandwidth, different interpolation order for the 
value of the closest points, 2nd order and 4-th order finite       
difference scheme to the Laplace operator. In most cases, MATLAB   
backslash works pretty well in solving the resulting linear system.
The size of the matrix which makes MATLAB backslash not work is not
the largest among all, and its condition number is not largest     
among all. By the way, the AMG solver by Notay and a geometric     
multigrid solver written by myself works pretty well for this case.

Ordering statistics:	result
nnz(chol(P*(A+A'+s*I)*P')) with AMD	4,473
Cholesky flop count	6.9e+04
nnz(L+U), no partial pivoting, with AMD	8,638
nnz(V) for QR, upper bound nnz(L) for LU, with COLAMD	4,233
nnz(R) for QR, upper bound nnz(U) for LU, with COLAMD	9,988

SVD-based statistics:
norm(A)	779.568
min(svd(A))	0.0554845
cond(A)	14050.2
rank(A)	308
sprank(A)-rank(A)	0
null space dimension	0
full numerical rank?	yes

singular values (MAT file):	click here
SVD method used:	s = svd (full (A))
status:	ok

For a description of the statistics displayed above, click here.

Maintained by Tim Davis, last updated 12-Mar-2014.
Matrix pictures by cspy, a MATLAB function in the CSparse package.
Matrix graphs by Yifan Hu, AT&T Labs Visualization Group.